What’s the difference between Michael Jackson and Gary Glitter? Nothing! They’re both paedophiles! The only reason Jackson wasn’t charged and convicted was cos he bought his victims off. Glitter is now a pariah, and quite rightly so, I would have said, until I started seeing TV adverts for Michael Jacksons Greatest Hits album. Still; bribery costs. I would post some Gary Glitter, but I aint got any left, not since I burnt it all when I heard he was a paedo! Money talks and bullshit (moon)walks!
Tuesday 2 September 2008
What’s the difference between Michael Jackson and Gary Glitter? Nothing! They’re both paedophiles! The only reason Jackson wasn’t charged and convicted was cos he bought his victims off. Glitter is now a pariah, and quite rightly so, I would have said, until I started seeing TV adverts for Michael Jacksons Greatest Hits album. Still; bribery costs. I would post some Gary Glitter, but I aint got any left, not since I burnt it all when I heard he was a paedo! Money talks and bullshit (moon)walks!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Careful Nuzz. Your starting to sound like a Daily Mail reader.
No idea about Jacko, but certainly Glitter's crimes are completely abhorrent. The sad fact is though is that most children are at risk from family members, not the dirty mac wearing stranger.
The family courts are full of these cases, but the media are barred from reporting on them.
The media can't report on family cases as it would identify the victim, not to protect the rapist.
Is it true that when Gary arrived for his stretch in an English prison all the inmates were song 'Do You Wanna Be In My Gang' when he arrived?
Post a Comment