In 41 police force areas across Britain
there are Elections for Police and Crime Commissioners coming up.
Across the country people will be able to vote for someone to
represent them by holding the Police to public account. The roll of
commissioner is also to help produce policing plans and set out
police policies for local communities. Three quarters of the
candidates have political allegiances and alliances, this is not
good!
Once politics and the police get into
bed with each other, we are fucked! and it's the conception of a
legitimate British police state that can be born in the future;
because the public have voted for Police Commissioners with political
allegiances. Who will have the power to control the police and how
they enforce the law and maintain order;
Softly, Softly or Robo Cop? You decide,
but how much do people trust their choices? Cos I certainly don't,
not with the reactionary, scaremongering media and their mind control
orders.
Will many people vote? Just how much do
people care about who makes the decisions?
With recent public criticism of the
police's behaviour and conduct; Hillsboro ugh, Ian Tomlinson, it
would seem that the police do need to be held to account by the
public. The public are also unhappy about the way the streets are
being policed, and how the law is enforced. Within the Police force
itself moral is low, officers are unhappy with senior management.
The police have always been servants of
the state, but not under total state control. by politicising the
police this would change. Who's gonna police the police?.... The
people the police really serve, that's who!
We are already living in a 24/7
surveillance society, with mechanisms already in place in place The
Criminal Justice Bill, Anti Terror Laws, just a couple of things that
spring to mind, along with new Squatting Laws,
If you haven't done anything wrong why
should you be scared of living in a police state? But who decides
what is right and wrong in say 30 years time?
In relation to the whole Jimmy Savile
shit storm, it could be said that we are judging his and other
celebrities actions around young girls with a different set of moral
values, in the past for want of a better word, it seemed more
acceptable in the entertainment industry to have relationships with
young women, John Peel even ran a schoolgirl of the year competition
on a radio show of his. Yet as a society a decade into the new
millennium we have seen young people becoming sexualised at a younger
age through for example fashion.
It's all contradictions
Blanket coverage of US Elections in the
British media recently, yes it's important who runs the worlds most
powerful country, so will we see same amount on Chinas communist
party changing its leadership. Or will it be all about the
paedophiles and child abuse. Jim has fixed it!
Looks like the paedophiles have it, or
rather its all about the media and how they have handled recent
stories about child abuse. The BBC have come off rather worse,
criticism of their Newsnight Programs failure to run with an
investigation into Jimmy Savile, saw them investigate allegations of
abuse in a care home in Wales involving a former top Tory MP.
Newsnight alluded to who the MP might
be, which saw the MP in question jump to defend himself and deny any
involvement in child abuse. His initial accuser now says he made a
mistake, and it was someone different. Heads have rolled at the BBC
can the organisation still be trusted? No more than politicians and
the police. ITV is just as guilty, on it's This Morning program the
Prime Minister was given a list with names of alleged Tory
paedophiles on and asked to comment, they'd got the list from the
internet. Mrs Wolfs mum sent me a link to 'the list' a week or so
ago, she knows my dislike of politicians. But.... even I can't
believe that Jimmy Savile procured young boys/girls for former Prime
Minister Gordon Brown, or did he and in fact it's.... The Big Lie;
something so unbelievable, that it is actually true. Trial by
Twitter, but what if some accusations are true, and there are
paedophiles in high places like Houses of Parliament or the BBC.
By discrediting these allegations
future investigations of inappropriate sexual improprieties by
figures in the establishment will be harder to carry out. Everything
is covered up, the guilty stay hidden, protected by their system and
the old boy public school network.
The one thing that is getting forgotten about is that children were abused in care homes, where there was no care,
they have lived with the abuse they suffered and are now speaking
out, I don't think this story will go away, if anything it provides a
big distraction from bigger lies.
The media, especially TV have acted dangereously and destructively in the way they have handled the whole abuse story/scandal.
Freedom of the media and the internet
is going to become under threat in the wake of this whole affair.
The there are going to be the findings of the Leveson Enquirey into
press standards, brought about by the phone hacking scandal.
How long before the political parties
really do start to control the media. Perhaps we could vote on a
commissioner for the BBC, to hold the organisation to account.
3 comments:
I think that an overview shows us that the establishment are looking to implement stronger control measures on everyone. Individuals and the press.
Too right they are, and the people will vote for it without even thinking about the consequences of their actions.
I'm all good Nuzz thanks. Na retired from the blogging world. It's hard enough signing in to blogger and staying signed in these days as well as trying to solve capchas when commenting! I blame Cameron and his incompetant government. I bet he had something to do with Windows 7 as well knowing him :)
Notenote: 4th attempt at solving this puzzle now.....
Post a Comment